¸´µ©2004Äê¹ú¼Ê·¨ÊÔÌâ
2004Äê¹ú¼Ê·¨ÊÔÌâ<È«²¿>
Ò»,Ãû´Ê½âÊÍ(5*12)
1,Ò鶨Êé(protocol)
2,Òý¶É(extradition)
3,¶þ¼¶Ê¶±ð(secondary characterisation)
4,ÆÕ»ÝÖÆ(GSP)
5,º£¹Ø¹À¼Û(customs evaluation)
6,´ó¹úÒ»ÖÂÔÔò(concurring votes)
7,the right of innocent passage
8,the Peace of Westphalia
9,the evasion of law
10,lex loci delicti
11,GATS
12,TRIPS
¶þ,ÂÛÊöÌâ(15*4)
1,ÂÛÊö¹ú¼ÊÌõÔ¼ºÍ¹úÄÚ·¨µÄ¹Øϵ
2,¼òÊöÏÖÐÐÍâ²ã¿Õ¼ä·¨ÓйØÓԱºÍ¿Õ¼äÎïÌå·¨µÄ·¨ÂÉÖƶÈ
3,ÊÔÊöÖٲõط¨ºÍ¹ú¼ÊÉÌÊÂÖٲõĹØϵ
4,ÂÛÊöWTOÕù¶Ë½â¾öµÄ»ù±¾³ÌÐòÓëGATTÕù¶Ë½â¾öÏà±ÈµÄ½ø²½
Èý,°¸ÀýÌâ(30)
The Lotus Case
France V. Turkey (1927)
P.C.I.J. Reports, Series A No.10
On August 2nd, 1926, the French steamer, Lotus,collided on the high seas with
the Turkish steamer Boz-kourt, due allegedly to the grass negligence of the
watch on board the Lotus, with the result of loss of the Boz-kourt having i
nvolved the death of eight Turkish sailors and passengers. Upon the arrivin
g of the French steamer at Constantinpole, the Turkish authorities instituted
proceedings against the officer of the watch, basing the claim to jurisdicti
on on the ground that the act of negligence on board the Lotus has produced e
ffects on the Boz-kourt, and thus according to the rule of internatinal law,
on a portion of Turkish territory.
1,What is the name of the Jurisdiction which Turkish based its claim? Explain
that jurisdiction(please answer in English)
2,Is the action of the Turkish authorities consistent with international law?
Why?(please answer in English)
3,Èç¹û±¾°¸·¢ÉúÔÚÀ뿪Öйúº£°¶Ïß24º£ÀïµÄµØ·½,¸ù¾Ý<º£Ñ󷨹«Ô¼>ÎÒ¹ú·¨Ôº¶Ô´Ë°¸ÓÐûÓÐ
¹ÜϽȨ?Ϊʲô?
