öλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ

2019Äê±±¾©´óѧÍâ¹úÓïѧԺӢÓïÓïÑÔÎÄѧ669öλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØÄÜÁ¦ÕæÌâ»ØÒä°æ

±¾Õ¾Ð¡±à FreeöλÔÓéÀÖ¹Ù·½appÏÂÔØÍø/2019-05-28
Ò»£¬Ó¢ÒëÖУ¬Character is the highest form of nature…ÄѶȱÈÎÄ»¯ÓëÎÞÕþ¸®Ö÷ÒåµÍÒ»µã£¬³¤¶ÈÒ»Ò³°ë£¬50·Ö

¶þ£¬ÖÐÒëÓ¢£¬ÖÐÎ÷ÎÄ»¯³¬Ô½ÊÀ½çºÍ×ÔÈ»ÊÀ½ç¹Û²»Í¬£¬Î÷·½ÎÄ»¯ÓÐÒ»µÀ²»¿ÉÓâÔ½µÄºè¹µ£¬ÖйúÎÄ»¯Ôò½²¾¿ÌìÈ˺ÏÒ» …ƪ·ù²»³¤£¬ÖÐÎÄ×ÖÊýÄ¿²âÁ½Èý°Ù£¬40·Ö

Èý£¬ÔĶÁLiterature and Ideology£¬³¤¶ÈÈýËÄÃæ×óÓÒ¡£µÚÒ»ÎÊÎÄÖе¥´Ê½âÊÍ£¬13¸ö£¬foster£¬anarchy£¬antidote£¬trivia£¬turbulent£¬pacify£¬evaporate£¬ÆäËû²»¼ÇµÃÁË¡£

µÚ¶þÎÊÔõôÀí½âÎÄÖÐÌáµ½Á½´ÎµÄsocial cement£¬µÚÈýÎʳ¤¾äÖÐÌôÁËÈý¸ö´Ê½âÊÍrefreshingly unhypocritical£¬disarmingly candid£¬feeble pretence£¬È»ºóparaphraseÕû¸ö¾ä×Ó¡£µÚËÄÎʳ¤¾ä×Ó£¬½âÊ;ä×ÓÒâ˼¡£µÚÎåÎÊ×÷ÎÄ£¬400-500×Ö£¬weakness and strength of the ideological approach to English literature study


µÚ¶þÖÖ°æ±¾


Ò»£ºÓ¢Ò뺺 50·Ö¡£
Character is nature in the highest form. It is of no use to ape it or to contend with it. Somewhat is possible of resistance, and of persistence, and of creation, to this power, which will foil all emulation.
This masterpiece is best where no hands but nature\'s have been laid on it. Care is taken that the greatly-destined shall slip up into life in the shade, with no thousand-eyed Athens to watch and blazon every new thought, every blushing emotion of young genius. Two persons lately, very young children of the most high God, have given me occasion for thought. When I explored the source of their sanctity and charm for the imagination, it seemed as if each answered, \'From my nonconformity; I never listened to your people\'s law, or to what they call their gospel, and wasted my time. I was content with the simple rural poverty of my own; hence this sweetness; my work never reminds you of that;--is pure of that.\' And nature advertises me in such persons that in democratic America she will not be democratized. How cloistered and constitutionally sequestered from the market and from scandal! It was only this morning that I sent away some wild flowers of these wood-gods. They are a relief from literature,--these fresh draughts from the sources of thought and sentiment; as we read, in an age of polish and criticism, the first lines of written prose and verse of a nation. How captivating is their devotion to their favorite books, whether Aeschylus, Dante, Shakspeare, or Scott, as feeling that they have a stake in that book; who touches that, touches them;--and especially the total solitude of the critic, the Patmos of thought from which he writes, in unconsciousness of any eyes that shall ever read this writing. Could they dream on still, as angels, and not wake to comparisons, and to be flattered! Yet some natures are too good to be spoiled by praise, and wherever the vein of thought reaches down into the profound, there is no danger from vanity. Solemn friends will warn them of the danger of the head\'s being turned by the flourish of trumpets, but they can afford to smile.
As I have said, Nature keeps these sovereignties in her own hands, and however pertly our sermons and disciplines would divide some share of credit, and teach that the laws fashion the citizen, she goes her own gait and puts the wisest in the wrong. She makes very light of gospels and prophets, as one who has a great many more to produce and no excess of time to spare on any one. There is a class of men, individuals of which appear at long intervals, so eminently endowed with insight and virtue that they have been unanimously saluted as divine, and who seem to be an accumulation of that power we consider. Divine persons are character born, or, to borrow a phrase from Napoleon, they are victory organized.

¶þ£ºººÒëÓ¢ 40·Ö¡£
ÎÄÕ¸оõºÜÉúÓ²£¬²éÁËһϴó¸ÅÊǸ´µ©´óѧÕÜѧѧԺ½ÌÊÚÕÅÈêÂ×·¢±íÓÚ2018ÄêµÚ03Æڵġ¶ÕÜѧÑо¿¡·µÄÎÄÕ¡¶ÂÛ“ÄÚÔÚ³¬Ô½”¡·½ØÈ¡µÄ¼¸¾ä»°ÉúÀ­ÔÚÒ»Æð£¬ÓеÄÊǺºÑ§¼ÒÓàӢʱµÄ»°£¬ÓеĻ°ÊÇÊ·»ª×ȵą…·­ÒëµÄÄÚÈÝ´ó¸ÅÈçÏ£º

ÖÐÎ÷ÎÄ»¯¶¼ÈÏΪÈ˼äÖÈÐòºÍµÀµÂ¼ÛÖµµÄÀ´Ô´Êdz¬Ô½ÐÔµÄ:Î÷·½ÔÚ°ØÀ­Í¼ÄÇÀïÊÇÀíÐÍ, ÔÚ»ù¶½½ÌÄÇÀïÊÇÉϵÛ, ¶øÖйú±ãÊÇÌì¡£µ«ÊÇ, ÔÚ´¦Àí³¬Ô½ÊÀ½çÓëÏÖʵÊÀ½çµÄ¹ØϵÉÏ, »òÓÃÖйúµÄÊõÓï˵ÌìÈ˹ØϵÉÏ, ÖÐÎ÷ÎÄ»¯åÄÈ»Á½Ñù¡£Î÷·½ÔÚ³¬Ô½ÊÀ½çºÍÏÖʵÊÀ½çÖ®¼ä»®ÏÂÒ»µÀ²»¿ÉÓâÔ½µÄºè¹µ¡£¶øÖйúÈËÈÏΪ“Á½¸öÊÀ½çÔòÊÇ»¥ÏཻÉæ, ÀëÖÐÓкϺÏÖÐÓÐÀëµÄ”¡£¾ßÌå¶øÑÔ, ÕâÖÖ²»¼´²»ÀëµÄ¹Øϵ¾ÍÊdz¬Ô½ÐԵĵÀ¼´ÔÚÈËÂ×ÈÕÓÃÖ®ÖÐ, ¶øÈËÂ×ÈÕÓÃÒ²²»ÄÜÐëô§ÀëµÀ¡£ÖйúÈ˹Ø×¢µÄÊǵÀµÂ-¾«ÉñÉú»îÖ÷¹ÛÄÚÔڵķ½Ãæ¡£ÈËÄÜÅàÑø×Ô¼ºÄÚÔڵĵÀµÂ³É³¤ÄÜÁ¦, ÄÜ´ïµ½±»³ÆΪÈʵÄÄÚÔÚµÀµÂÍêÉÆ¡£»òÕß˵, ÈËÄÜÔÚ×Ô¼ºÉíÉϳ¬Ô½ÊµÈ»Ç÷ÏòӦȻ (¼´ÊµÏÖµÀµÂÐÐΪ) ¡£ÔÚ´ËÒâÒåÉÏ, Éç»áÖÐÂ×ÀíµÄÊÂÎïÊdzöÓÚÈ˵ÄÖ÷Ìå¡£ËùνÏòÄÚ³¬Ô½, ÊÇÖ¸¹Ø×¢µÀµÂ-¾«ÉñÉú»îµÄÖ÷¹Û·½Ãæ¡£ µ«Õâ²¢²»ÊÇ˵µÀµÂµÄ¸ù¾ÝÔÚÈ˵ÄÖ÷¹ÛÐÔ, ¸ü²»ÊÇ˵“³¬Ô½”¸ÅÄîʧȥÁËÆäÍâÔÚÐԵĺ¬Òå¡£³ýÁ˵ÀµÂµÄÄÚÔÚ¸ùÔ´Íâ, ʼÖÕ´æÔÚÍâÔÚµÄÀíÏëÉç»áÖÈÐòºÍÕý³£µÄ×ÔÈ»ÖÈÐò¡£

Èý.ÔĶÁ 60·Ö
ÔĶÁ¿¼µÄÊÇÒÁ¸ñ¶û¶ÙÄDZ¾ÎÄѧÀíÂÛLiterary Theory£ºAn IntroductionµÄµÚÒ»ÕÂThe Rise of English½ÚÑ¡£¬ÍâÑÐÉçÓ°Ó¡°æ19Ò³To speak English LiteratureÕâÒ»¶Î¿ªÊ¼——22Ò³Like the religionÕâÒ»¶ÎÉÏÃæÄÇÒ»¶Î½áβ½áÊø£¬ÄÚÈÝÊÇÎÄѧºÍÒâʶÐÎ̬µÄ¹Øϵ¡£

1. 13¸öµ¥´Ê½âÊÍ£¬13·Ö¡£
evaporate pacify foster contemplative equanimity resonance turbulent philistine anarchy menace antidote trivia luminous
2. ¼¸¸ö¶ÌÓïºÍ¾ä×ÓµÄparaphrase£¬3·Ö+6·Ö+6·Ö¡£
µÚÒ»Ì⿼ÁËsocial cementµÄº¬Ò壬ÔÚÑ¡¶ÎµÄµÚ¶þ¶ÎµÚÈý¶Î¹²³öÏÖÁ½´Î£¬ÈçºÎÀí½âsocial cement
µÚ¶þÌ⿼µÄÊÇparaphrase \"Like all successful ideologies, it works much less by explicit concepts...mythology\"Õâ¾ä»°¡£»¹Óиö¶ÌÓïµÄparaphraseÍüÁË¡£
µÚÈýÌâÊÇparaphrase \"refreshingly unhypocritical\"
²¢pharaphase \"Arnold is refreshingly unhypocritical: there is no feeble pretence ...in the least \'disinterested\' \"Õû¾ä»°¡£
×îºóÊÇÈÃ×ܽá×÷ÕߵĹ۵㣬Ȼºó¾ÍÓÃÒâʶÐÎ̬ÅúÆÀ·ÖÎö×÷Æ·µÄstrong points and weak points¸ø³öcritical responseÇÒ»¶Ó­ÓþßÌåÎÄѧ×÷Æ·À´ÂÛÊö¡£×÷ÎÄ32·Ö¡£ºÃÏñÒªÇóд450——500×Ö

Ïà¹Ø»°Ìâ/ÔĶÁ Éç»á ×ÔÈ» ×÷ÎÄ ÕÜѧ

FreeöλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØFreeKaoYan.Com
»¶Ó­À´µ½FreeöλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ£¬"ΪʵÏÖÈËÉúµÄFree¶ø·Ü¶·"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.

öλÔÓéÀÖ(xinhui)¹Ù·½ÍøÕ¾_öλÔÓéÀÖappÏÂÔØÈë¿Ú