öλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ

60. ¡°Employers should have no right to obtain information about their employees¡¯ health or other aspects of their personal lives without the employees¡¯ permission.¡±
¡°Ã»ÓйÍÔ±µÄͬÒâʱ£¬¹ÍÖ÷Ó¦¸ÃûÓÐȨÁ¦È¥Á˽âËûµÄ¹ÍÔ±µÄ½¡¿µ×´¿öºÍÆäËûµÄ˽ÈËÉú»î·½ÃæµÄÐÅÏ¢¡£¡±
1£¬ Ô±¹¤µÄ˽ÈËÉú»î×´¿ö£¬ºÜ¿ÉÄÜÓ°Ï칤×÷ЧÂÊ¡£productivity and turnover£¬ËùÒÔ¹ÍÖ÷ÓÐÀíÓɹØÐÄ¡£±ÈÈ磬½¡¿µÎÊÌ⣬Á¼ºÃµÄ½¡¿µ×´¿öÏÔÈ»ÊDZ£ÕÏÕý³£Îȶ¨Éú²úµÄ»ù´¡£¬¹ÍÖ÷¸¶³öÏàͬµÄÇ®£¬expect to get certain productivity. ¶øÔ±¹¤ÒþÂ÷½¡¿µ×´¿ö£¬Ôì³ÉµÄµÍЧÂʸ߳ɱ¾£¬»áʹ¹«Ë¾suffer¡£ÔÚ¹ÍӶʱӵÓжԳƵÄÐÅÏ¢£¬ºÜÖØÒª¡£
2£¬ ͬʱ£¬Ô±¹¤µÄ˽ÈË×´¿ö£¬Èç¹û»áΣº¦µ½ÆäËûÔ±¹¤£¬ÄÇôӦ¸ÃÓÐȨµÃÕâÖª¡£±ÈÈ磬½¡¿µ×´¿ö£¬·¸×ïµÄÀúÊ·µÈµÈÖØ´óʼþ¡£½¡¿µ£¬»áinfect other employee/ ±©Á¦ history of crimes violence ºÜ¿ÉÄÜ»á¶ÔÆäËûµÄÔ±¹¤Ôì³ÉÉ˺¦¡£ÕâЩ¶¼ÊDZØÐëÒªÖªµÀµÄ¡£
3£¬  µ«ÓÐһЩÆäËûµÄ˽ÈËÉú»î£¬Ó빤×÷ЧÂÊÎ޹أ¬¶øÇÒ²»ÊÇthreat to others¡£employer ûÓÐȨÁ¦»ñÈ¡¡£±ÈÈ磬»éÒö×´¿ömarital status, religion, race¡­ÕâЩ¶¼Ó¦¸ÃÊÇÔ±¹¤×ÔÔ¸ÌṩµÄwith permission£¬¶ø²»ÄÜÇ¿ÖÆ»ñµÃforce¡£


View1: as human resources is one of the most important fortunes to a company, companies should know the health conditions of their employees. Decide whether a worker is competent for a job, decide cost on medical cares, ensure productivity
View2: other aspects of employees¡¯ personal life, if not directly related to work performance, are not need to expose to employers.
 
 
Determining whether employers should have access to personal information about employees requires that the interests of businesses in ensuring productivity and stability be weighed against concerns about equity and privacy interests. On balance (adv. ×ܶøÑÔÖ®), my view is that employers should not have the right to obtain personal information about current employees without their consent.
A business¡¯ interest in maintaining a stable, productive workforce clearly justifies right of access to certain personal information about prospective employees. Job applicants can easily conceal personal information that might adversely affect job performance, thereby damaging the employer in terms of low productivity and high turnover. During employment, however, the employee¡¯s interests are far more compelling than those of the employer, for three reasons.
First, the employer has every opportunity to monitor ongoing job performance and to replace workers who fail to meet standards, regardless of the reason for that failure. Second, allowing free access to personal information about employees might open the floodgates to discriminatory promotions and salary adjustments. Current federal laws¡ªwhich protect employees from unfair treatment based on gender, race, and marital status, may not adequately guard against an employer¡¯s searching for an excuse to treat certain employees unfairly. Third, access to personal information without consent raises serious privacy concerns, especially where multiple individuals have access to the information. Heightening this concern is the ease of access to information which our burgeoning electronic Intranets make possible.
In sum, ready access to certain personal information about prospective employees is necessary to protect businesses; however, once hired, an employee¡¯s interest in equitable treatment and privacy far outweighs the employer¡¯s interest in ensuring a productive and stable workforce.