öλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ

1. Priestly explains how the deep bluecolor of the assistant¡¯s sweater descended over the years from fashion shows todepartment stores and to the bargain bin in which the poor girl doubtless foundher garment.(2013 T1 P1)

·­Ò룺Priestly½âÊÍÁËËýµÄÅ®ÖúÀíÉí´©µÄÄǼþëÒµÄÉîÀ¶É«¶àÄêÀ´ÊÇÔõÑù´ÓT̨ÂÙÂäµ½°Ù»õÉ̵ê,ÓÖÈçºÎ´Ó°Ù»õÉ̵êÂÙÂäµ½´òÕÛÇøÖÐ, ºÁÎÞÒÉÎÊ,Õâ¸ö¿ÉÁ¯µÄ¹ÃÄï×îºóÔÚÕâÀï(´òÕÛÇø)ÌÔµ½ÁËËü¡£(2013 T1 P1)

2. This top-down conception of thefashion business couldn¡¯t be more out of date or at odds with the feverishworld described in Overdressed, Elizabeth Cline¡¯s three-year indictment of¡°fast fashion¡±. (2013 T1 P2)

·­Ò룺Õâ¸öʱÉÐÒµ×ÔÉ϶øϵĸÅÄîÌ«¹ýʱÁË,»òÕß˵ËüºÍElizabeth ClineÔÚ¡¶¹ý¶È×Å×°¡·(Elizabeth ClineÓÃÈýÄêʱ¼äËùдµÄ¶ÔÓÚ¡°¿ìʱÉС±µÄ¿ØËß)Ò»ÊéÖÐËùÃèÊöµÄ¿ñÈÈÊÀ½ç´óÏྶͥ¡£(2013 T1 P2)

3.In December 2010 America¡¯s FederalTrade Commission (FTC) proposed adding a ¡°do not track¡± (DNT) option tointernet browsers, so that users could tell advertisers that they did not wantto be followed.(2013 T2 P3)

·­Ò룺2010Äê12ÔÂ,ÃÀ¹úÁª°îóÒ×ίԱ»áÌáÒéÔÚ»¥ÁªÍøä¯ÀÀÆ÷ÖÐÌí¼ÓÒ»¸ö¡°½ûÖ¹×·×Ù¡±µÄÑ¡Ïî,ÕâÑùÓû§¿ÉÒÔ¸æÖª¹ã¸æÉÌÃÇËûÃDz»Ïë±»×·×Ù¡£(2013 T2 P3)

4. Unable to tell whether someonereally objects to behavioural ads or whether they are sticking with Microsoft¡¯sdefault, some may ignore a DNT signal and press on anyway. (2013 T2 P6)

·­Ò룺ÓÉÓÚÎÞ·¨ÅжÏÈËÃÇÊÇÕæµÄ·´¶ÔÐÐΪ¹ã¸æ»¹ÊÇËûÃǼá³ÖʹÓÃ΢Èíä¯ÀÀÆ÷µÄĬÈÏÉèÖÃ,һЩ¹ã¸æÉÌ¿ÉÄÜ»áºöÊÓ¡°½ûÖ¹×·×Ù¡± µÄ±êÇ©,¼ÌÐø×·×Ù(ÈËÃǵÄÍøÉϺۼ£)¡£(2013 T2 P6)

5. If it is trying to upset Google, which relies almost wholly on advertising, ithas chosen an indirect method: There is no guarantee that DNT by default willbecome the norm. (2013 T2 P7)

·­Ò룺Èç¹û΢ÈíÊÔͼ»÷°Ü¼¸ºõÍêÈ«ÒÀ¿¿¹ã¸æÒµÎñµÄ¹È¸è,ÄÇôËüÑ¡ÔñÁËÒ»¸ö²¢²»Ö±½ÓµÄ·½·¨: ÎÒÃÇÎÞ·¨±£Ö¤°Ñ¡°½ûÖ¹×·×Ù¡±×÷ΪĬÈÏÉèÖûá³ÉΪÐÐÒµ×¼Ôò¡£(2013 T2 P7)

6. Look up Homo sapiens in the ¡°Red List¡± of threatenedspecies of the International Union for the Conversation of Nature (IUCN) andyou will read: ¡°Listed as Least Concern as the species is very widelydistributed, adaptable, currently increasing, and there are no major threatsresulting in an overall population decline.¡±(2013 T3 P3)

·­Ò룺ÔÚ¹ú¼Ê×ÔÈ»±£»¤ÁªÃ˵ġ°±ôΣÎïÖÖºìÉ«Ãûµ¥¡±ÖвéÔÄ¡°ÖÇÈË¡± ÕâÒ»ÌõÄ¿,Äã»á¿´µ½:¡°ÒòΪ´ËÎïÖÖ·Ö²¼¹ã·º,ÊÊÓ¦ÐÔÇ¿,Ä¿Ç°ÊýÁ¿ÕýÔÚ²»¶ÏÔö¼Ó, ²¢ÇÒûÓе¼Ö¸ÃÎïÖÖÊýÁ¿Ï½µµÄÖ÷ÒªÍþв, Òò´Ë¸ÃÎïÖÖ±»ÁÐΪÁËÎÞΣÎïÖÖ¡£¡±(2013 T3 P3)

7. As so often, the past holds the key to the future: wehave now identified enough of the long-term patterns shaping the history of theplanet, and our species, to make evidence-based forecasts about the situationsin which our descendants will find themselves.(2013 T3 P6)

·­Ò룺ÕýÈçºÜ¶àʱºò,¹ýÈ¥ÕÆÎÕ×ÅͨÍùδÀ´µÄÔ¿³×:ÎÒÃÇÏÖÔÚÒѾ­¶ÔËÜÔìµØÇòºÍÀúÊ·µÄ³¤ÆÚģʽÓÐÁ˺ܳä·ÖµÄÈÏʶ,ÎÒÃÇ¿ÉÒÔÒÔ´ËΪÒÀ¾ÝÀ´Ô¤²âÎÒÃÇ×ÓËïºó´úµÄÉú´æ»·¾³¡£(2013 T3 P6)

8. The Constitutional principles that Washington alonehas the power to ¡°establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization¡± and that federallaws precede state laws are noncontroversial.(2013 T4 P2)

·­Ò룺ÏÜ·¨¹æ¶¨Ö»ÓлªÊ¢¶ÙÕþ¸®ÓÐȨÀûÈ¥¡°Öƶ¨Í³Ò»µÄÈë¼®¹æÔò¡±,ÒÔ¼°Áª°î·¨ÂÉÓÅÏÈÓÚÖÝ·¨ÂÉ,ÕâÁ½ÏÊÇÎãÓ¹ÖÃÒɵÄ¡£(2013 T4 P2)

9. The Administration was in essence asserting thatbecause it didn¡¯t want to carry out Congress¡¯s immigration wishes, no stateshould be allowed to do so either. (2013 T4 P7)

·­Ò룺Õþ¸®ÊµÖÊÉÏÒ»Ö±Éù³ÆÒòΪ×Ô¼º²¢²»ÏëÖ´Ðйú»áµÄÒÆÃñÒâÔ¸,ËùÒÔËü(Õþ¸®)Ò²²»ÔÊÐíÈκÎÖÝÕâÑù×ö¡£(2013 T4 P7)

10. On first hearing, this was the socially concernedchancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with ¡°reforms¡± toan obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newlyunemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. (2014 T1 P2)

·­Ò룺էһÌý,ÕâÊÇһλ¹ØÐÄÃñÉúµÄ²ÆÕþ´ó³¼ÕýÊÔ×ÅÈ¥°ïÈËÃǸÄÉÆÉú»î,°üÀ¨È¥¡°¸Ä¸ï¡±Ò»¸öÃ÷ÏÔ×ÝÈݵÄÉç»á(¸£Àû)ϵͳ, Ëü¶ÔÐÂʧҵÕßÒªÇóÉõÉÙ²¢ÇÒ»¹×ÌÉúÀÁ¶è¡£(2014 T1 P2)

11. What motivated him, we were to understand, was hiszeal for ¡°fundamental fairness¡±¡ª protecting the taxpayer, controlling spendingand ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits. (2014 T1 P2)

·­Ò룺Ȼ¶øÎÒÃÇÒªÃ÷°×,ËûµÄ¶¯»úÊÇÔ´×ÔÓÚ¶Ô ¡°»ù±¾¹«Æ½¡±µÄÈÈÇ顪±£»¤ÄÉË°ÈË,¿ØÖÆ¿ªÏú²¢ÇÒÈ·±£Ö»ÓÐÄÇЩ×îÓ¦µÃµÄ¾È¼ÃµÄÉêÇëÕß²ÅÄÜÉêÁì¾È¼Ã½ð¡£(2014 T1 P2)

12. There is pressure for change from within theprofession, but opponents of change among the regulators insist that keepingoutsiders out of a law firm isolates lawyers from the pressure to make moneyrather than serve clients ethically. (2014 T2 P5)

·­Ò룺ÐÐÒµÄÚ²¿Ò²ÓиĸïµÄѹÁ¦,µ«ÊÇ·´¶Ô¸Ä¸ïµÄ¹ÜÀíÕß¼á³ÖÈÏΪ½ûÖ¹ÍâÈË(Íⲿ×ʽð) ½øÈëÂÉʦÊÂÎñËùʹµÃÂÉʦԶÀë׬ǮµÄѹÁ¦, ¶ø°´ÕÕÖ°ÒµµÀµÂ¸üºÃµØΪ¿Í»§·þÎñ¡£(2014 T2 P5)

13. In fact, allowing non-lawyers to own shares in lawfirms would reduce costs and improve services to customers, by encouraging lawfirms to use technology and to employ professional managers to focus onimproving firms¡¯ efficiency. (2014 T2 P6)

·­Ò룺ʵ¼ÊÉÏ,ͨ¹ýÂÉËùÔËÓÃеļ¼Êõ, ÕÐļÖÂÁ¦ÓÚÌáÉý¹«Ë¾Ð§ÂʵÄÖ°Òµ¾­ÀíÈË, ÔÊÐí·ÇÂÉʦӵÓÐÂÉʦÊÂÎñËùµÄ¹É·Ý,½«»á½µµÍ³É±¾,ÌáÉý·þÎñ(ÖÊÁ¿)¡£(2014 T2 P6)

14. There is just one path for a lawyer in most Americanstates: a four-year undergraduate degree in some unrelated subject, then athree- year law degree at one of 200 law schools authorized by the American BarAssociation and an expensive preparation for the bar exam. (2014 T2 P3)

·­Ò룺ÔÚÃÀ¹úµÄ¾ø´ó¶àÊýÖÝÏë³ÉΪÂÉʦֻÓÐÒ»Ìõ;¾¶: Ê×ÏÈÔÚ(Óë·¨ÂÉöλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ)²»Ïà¹ØµÄöλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔضÁËÄÄê±¾¿Æ,È»ºóÔÚ¾­¹ýÃÀ¹úÂÉʦЭ»áÊÚȨµÄ200Ëù·¨Ñ§ÔºÖжÁ 3 ÄêµÄ·¨Ñ§Ñ§Î»,²¢ÇÒÔÙ»¨¾Þ×Ê×¼±¸ÂÉʦ×ʸñöλÔÓéÀֵǼÈë¿ÚÏÂÔØ¡£(2014 T2 P3)

15. But the Nobel Foundation¡¯s limit of three recipientsper prize, each of whom must still be living, has long been outgrown by thecollaborative nature of modern research¡ªas will be demonstrated by theinevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discoveryof the Higgs boson. (2014 T3 P4)

·­Ò룺µ«ÊÇŵ±´¶ûѧ½±¹ØÓÚÿ¸ö½±ÏîÏÞÈýÃû»ñ½±Õß,¶øÇÒËûÃDZØÐëÔÚÊÀµÄÏÞÖÆÒѾ­ÒòΪÏÖ´ú¿ÆѧµÄºÏ×÷·½Ê½¶ø±äµÃ²»ÔÙÊÊÓÃ,²¢½«»áÔÚ³ÐÈÏÏ£¸ñ˹²£É«×ӵķ¢ÏÖʱ±»Ö¤Ã÷,ÒòΪµ½Ê±»á²»¿É±ÜÃâµÄ³öÏÖÄÄλ¿Æѧ¼Ò±»ºöÊÓÁËÕâÑùµÄÕùÂÛ¡£(2014 T3 P4)

16. Among the commission¡¯s 51 members are top-tier-university presidents, scholars, lawyers, judges, and business executives, aswell as prominent figures from diplomacy, filmmaking, music and journalism. (2014 T4 P2)

·­Ò룺¸ÃίԱ»áÓÉ51ÃûίԱ×é³É,ÔÚËûÃǵ±ÖÐ,Óж¥¼¶¸ßµÈѧУµÄУ³¤¡¢Ñ§Õß¡¢ÂÉʦ¡¢·¨¹ÙÒÔ¼°ÆóÒµ¾­Àí,»¹°üÀ¨ÁËÍâ½»¡¢µçÓ°¡¢ÒôÀÖºÍÐÂÎŽçµÄ½Ü³öµÄÈËÎï¡£(2014 T4 P2)

17. The commission ignores that for several decadesAmerica¡¯s colleges and universities have produced graduates who don¡¯t know thecontent and character of liberal education and are thus deprived of itsbenefits. (2014 T4 P4)

·­Ò룺ίԱ»áºöÂÔÁËÊýÊ®ÄêÀ´´æÔÚµÄÎÊÌâ,ÃÀ¹ú´óѧËùÅàÑø³öÀ´µÄ±ÏÒµÉú²¢Î´ÕæÕýÁ˽âÈËÎĽÌÓýµÄÄÚÈݺÍÌصã,Òò´Ë²¢Ã»ÓдÓÖлñÒæ¡£(2014 T4 P4)

18. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economistsare warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth,it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolicheart of modern democratic states. (2015 T1 P4)

·­Ò룺µ± ThomasPikettyºÍÆäËû¾­¼Ãѧ¼Ò¿ªÊ¼¶ÔÓÚÈÕÒæ¼Ó¾çµÄ²»¹«ºÍ¼Ì³Ð²Æ¸»µÄȨÀû·¢³ö¾¯¸æʱ,ÄÇЩ¸»ÓеĹó×å¼ÒÍ¥ÒÀÈ»±»¿´×öÊÇÏÖ´úÃñÖ÷¹ú¼ÒÏóÕ÷¾ÍÏÔµÃÁîÈ˷ѽâÁË¡£(2015 T1 P4)

19. While Europe¡¯s monarchies will no doubt be smartenough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have mostto fear from the Spanish example. (2015 T1 P6)

·­Ò룺²é¶û˹Ӧ¸ÃÃ÷°×:ÕýÈçÓ¢¹úÀúÊ·Ëùʾ,¹²ºÍµ³²¢·Ç¾ýÖ÷ÖÆ×î´óµÄµÐÈË,¹úÍõ(±¾ÉíµÄÑÔÐÐ) ²ÅÊǾýÖ÷ÖÆ×î´óµÄµÐÈË¡£(2015 T1 P6)

20. The Supreme Court will now consider whether policecan search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is onor around a person during an arrest. (2015 T2 P1)

·­Ò룺ÏÖÔÚ,×î¸ß·¨Ôº½«Òª¿¼ÂǵÄÊǾ¯²ìÊÇ·ñ¿ÉÒÔÔÚûÓÐËѲéÁîµÄÇé¿öÏÂËѲéÔÚ´þ²¶ÆÚ¼äµÄÏÓÒÉÈ˵ÄÊÖ»úÄÚÈÝ¡£(2015 T2 P1)

21. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendmentprotections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could takereasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while awarrant is pending. (2015 T2 P6)

·­Ò룺µ±ÃæÁÙÑÏÖؽô¼±Çé¿öʱËûÃÇÈÔÈ»»áÎ¥·´µÚËÄÐÞÕý·¨°¸µÄ±£»¤ÌõÀý,ËûÃÇÐèÒª²ÉÈ¡ºÏÀíµÄ´ëÊ©À´È·±£ÔÚûÓÐÄõ½ËѲéÁîµÄʱºòÊÖ»úÊý¾Ý²»»á±»É¾³ý»òÐ޸ġ£(2015 T2 P6)

22. Asked whether any particular papers had impelled thechange, McNutt said: ¡°The creation of the ¡®statistics board¡¯ was motivated byconcerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis inscientific research and is part of Science¡¯s overall drive to increasereproducibility in the research we publish.¡± (2015 T3 P3)

·­Ò룺µ±±»Îʼ°ÊÇ·ñÊÇijƪÌض¨µÄ³ö°æÎï´ÙʹÁËÕâ¸ö±ä»¯,McNutt»Ø´ðµÀ:¡°Í³¼ÆίԱ»áµÄÉèÁ¢ÊÇÊܶԿÆѧµ÷²éµÄͳ¼ÆÓ¦ÓúÍÊý¾Ý·ÖÎöµÄ¹ã·ºµ£ÓÇËùÇýʹµÄ,²¢ÇÒËüÊÇÔÓÖ¾ÕûÌåÇ÷ÊƵÄÒ»²¿·Ö,ÓÃÒÔÔö¼Ó³ö°æÎÄÕµĿɸ´ÖÆÐÔ¡£¡± (2015 T3 P3)

23. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrotein 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, ¡°engaging reviewers whoare statistically literate and editors who can verify the process¡±. (2015 T3 P6)

·­Ò룺ËûÔÚ2012Äêдµ½Ñо¿ÕßÓ¦¸ÃÌáÉýËûÃǵıê×¼,¶øÔÓÖ¾Ò²Ó¦¸Ã²ÉÈ¡Ò»¸ö¸ü¼ÓÑϸñµÄ·Ïß¡°²ÎÓëµÄÉó²éÕßÓ¦¸Ã¾ßÓÐͳ¼Æѧ֪ʶ,²¢Çұ༭Ӧ¸ÃºËʵÕâÒ»Á÷³Ì¡±¡£(2015 T3 P6)

24. One of the astonishing revelations was how littleRebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, how little she thought toask and the fact that she never inquired how the stories arrived. (2015 T4 P4)

·­Ò룺ÆäÖÐÒ»¸öÁîÈ˾ªÑȵÄÊÂʵÊÇRebekah Brooks¾¹²»ÖªµÀËýµÄ±à¼­²¿Ëù·¢ÉúµÄÊÂ,ҲûÏëµ½×Ô¼º»á±»ÉóÎÊ,ÊÂʵÉÏ,ËýÒ²´Óδ¹ýÎÊÊÂÇéÊÇÔõÑù·¢ÉúµÄ¡£(2015 T4 P4)

25. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions abouthow her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave noinstructions¡ªnor received traceable, recorded answers. (2015 T4 P6)

·­Ò룺BrooksŮʿ¿ÉÄÜ»³ÒÉ»ò¿ÉÄÜû»³ÒɹýËýµÄ¼ÇÕßÃÇÊÇÈçºÎµÃµ½ËûÃÇËùдµÄ¹ÊʵÄ, µ«ÊÇËýûÓÐѯÎÊ,ûÓÐ×ö³öָʾ,¼´Ã»Óеõ½¿É×·ËݵļǼÏÂÀ´µÄ»Ø´ð¡£(2015 T4 P6)